State hub ยท AZ
Arizona property crime city data
Validated city-level FBI NIBRS selected property-offense pages for Arizona. This page summarizes candidate cities in the dataset; it is not a statewide crime-rate claim.
Candidate-city rate
18.16
per 1,000 residents across listed cities; not a statewide risk score
Validated cities40Current candidate pages
Candidate population4,059,497Sum of listed city estimates
Selected offenses73,714FBI NIBRS offense records
Highest-rate city candidates
Use the city pages for source notes, trend handling, and offense mix. Small or ambiguous places remain outside automatic publication.
Globe
55.83 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Page
54.29 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Kingman
35.21 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Tucson
33.77 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Tempe
29.62 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Glendale
27.20 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Arizona city candidates
| City | Population | Selected offenses | Rate per 1,000 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Globe | 7,164 | 400 | 55.83 | Increasing |
| Page | 7,184 | 390 | 54.29 | Increasing |
| Kingman | 35,585 | 1,253 | 35.21 | Roughly stable |
| Tucson | 550,633 | 18,595 | 33.77 | Trend pending |
| Tempe | 189,376 | 5,610 | 29.62 | Decreasing |
| Glendale | 256,776 | 6,985 | 27.20 | Increasing |
| Show Low | 12,377 | 295 | 23.83 | Roughly stable |
| Flagstaff | 77,305 | 1,753 | 22.68 | Increasing |
| Avondale | 96,646 | 2,144 | 22.18 | Decreasing |
| Scottsdale | 244,686 | 4,704 | 19.22 | Decreasing |
| Sierra Vista | 44,441 | 743 | 16.72 | Increasing |
| Coolidge | 19,157 | 316 | 16.50 | Mixed |
| Casa Grande | 67,200 | 1,086 | 16.16 | Decreasing |
| Douglas | 15,704 | 243 | 15.47 | Decreasing |
| Apache Junction | 43,175 | 662 | 15.33 | Roughly stable |
| Chandler | 280,014 | 4,255 | 15.20 | Mixed |
| Mesa | 514,789 | 7,822 | 15.19 | Decreasing |
| Goodyear | 117,669 | 1,747 | 14.85 | Mixed |
| Marana | 61,976 | 820 | 13.23 | Decreasing |
| Payson | 16,776 | 221 | 13.17 | Decreasing |
| Yuma | 104,113 | 1,346 | 12.93 | Decreasing |
| Peoria | 198,735 | 2,549 | 12.83 | Decreasing |
| El Mirage | 36,268 | 458 | 12.63 | Decreasing |
| Oro Valley | 48,535 | 561 | 11.56 | Decreasing |
| Camp Verde | 12,636 | 146 | 11.55 | Mixed |
| Prescott | 48,232 | 543 | 11.26 | Mixed |
| Eloy | 19,517 | 213 | 10.91 | Decreasing |
| Sahuarita | 37,202 | 381 | 10.24 | Increasing |
| Paradise Valley | 12,501 | 124 | 9.92 | Decreasing |
| Gilbert | 287,133 | 2,735 | 9.53 | Decreasing |
| Litchfield Park | 6,820 | 65 | 9.53 | Roughly stable |
| Maricopa | 74,889 | 693 | 9.25 | Increasing |
| Surprise | 167,602 | 1,462 | 8.72 | Decreasing |
| Queen Creek | 82,973 | 695 | 8.38 | Decreasing |
| Prescott Valley | 51,281 | 421 | 8.21 | Roughly stable |
| Buckeye | 118,893 | 893 | 7.51 | Decreasing |
| San Luis | 40,203 | 218 | 5.42 | Decreasing |
| Somerton | 14,976 | 80 | 5.34 | Roughly stable |
| Chino Valley | 13,866 | 66 | 4.76 | Decreasing |
| Florence | 24,489 | 21 | 0.86 | Trend pending |
Important context
These figures are based on reported selected property offenses and Census population context for validated city candidates. Agency reporting boundaries can differ from municipal boundaries, so the methodology page explains why ambiguous or tiny-denominator rows stay out of automatic publication.