State hub ยท NH
New Hampshire property crime city data
Validated city-level FBI NIBRS selected property-offense pages for New Hampshire. This page summarizes candidate cities in the dataset; it is not a statewide crime-rate claim.
Candidate-city rate
6.90
per 1,000 residents across listed cities; not a statewide risk score
Validated cities62Current candidate pages
Candidate population646,097Sum of listed city estimates
Selected offenses4,455FBI NIBRS offense records
Highest-rate city candidates
Use the city pages for source notes, trend handling, and offense mix. Small or ambiguous places remain outside automatic publication.
Seabrook
24.54 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Conway
22.17 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Salem
20.40 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Epping
18.50 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Plymouth
16.45 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
Littleton
13.64 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents
New Hampshire city candidates
| City | Population | Selected offenses | Rate per 1,000 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seabrook | 8,436 | 207 | 24.54 | Roughly stable |
| Conway | 10,283 | 228 | 22.17 | Increasing |
| Salem | 31,622 | 645 | 20.40 | Increasing |
| Epping | 7,783 | 144 | 18.50 | Increasing |
| Plymouth | 6,688 | 110 | 16.45 | Roughly stable |
| Littleton | 6,012 | 82 | 13.64 | Roughly stable |
| Hudson | 25,787 | 304 | 11.79 | Increasing |
| Gilford | 7,893 | 92 | 11.66 | Roughly stable |
| Jaffrey | 5,595 | 56 | 10.01 | Increasing |
| Amherst | 11,920 | 111 | 9.31 | Roughly stable |
| Bedford | 23,866 | 208 | 8.72 | Mixed |
| Rindge | 6,487 | 52 | 8.02 | Decreasing |
| Belmont | 7,414 | 59 | 7.96 | Decreasing |
| Northfield | 5,057 | 40 | 7.91 | Decreasing |
| Plaistow | 7,846 | 61 | 7.77 | Increasing |
| Hampton | 16,419 | 127 | 7.73 | Roughly stable |
| Farmington | 6,833 | 52 | 7.61 | Decreasing |
| Derry | 34,036 | 254 | 7.46 | Roughly stable |
| Hillsborough | 6,089 | 44 | 7.23 | Increasing |
| Barnstead | 5,029 | 34 | 6.76 | Roughly stable |
| Newport | 6,402 | 43 | 6.72 | Mixed |
| New Ipswich | 5,403 | 33 | 6.11 | Increasing |
| Wolfeboro | 6,607 | 39 | 5.90 | Roughly stable |
| Hooksett | 15,320 | 89 | 5.81 | Decreasing |
| Alton | 6,042 | 35 | 5.79 | Increasing |
| Meredith | 6,841 | 38 | 5.55 | Decreasing |
| Exeter | 16,225 | 87 | 5.36 | Roughly stable |
| Wakefield | 5,542 | 29 | 5.23 | Decreasing |
| Pelham | 14,681 | 73 | 4.97 | Decreasing |
| Goffstown | 18,556 | 88 | 4.74 | Decreasing |
| Hanover | 12,075 | 57 | 4.72 | Decreasing |
| Peterborough | 6,456 | 30 | 4.65 | Decreasing |
| Moultonborough | 5,248 | 24 | 4.57 | Increasing |
| Swanzey | 7,471 | 34 | 4.55 | Increasing |
| Milford | 16,532 | 75 | 4.54 | Roughly stable |
| Londonderry | 27,078 | 122 | 4.51 | Decreasing |
| Bow | 8,377 | 34 | 4.06 | Decreasing |
| Loudon | 5,749 | 23 | 4.00 | Decreasing |
| Epsom | 5,020 | 20 | 3.98 | Mixed |
| Henniker | 6,228 | 24 | 3.85 | Decreasing |
| Newmarket | 9,518 | 36 | 3.78 | Increasing |
| Hampstead | 9,115 | 33 | 3.62 | Roughly stable |
| Rye | 5,651 | 20 | 3.54 | Mixed |
| Merrimack | 29,336 | 103 | 3.51 | Decreasing |
| Brookline | 5,816 | 20 | 3.44 | Increasing |
| Raymond | 11,023 | 37 | 3.36 | Decreasing |
| Hollis | 8,754 | 29 | 3.31 | Roughly stable |
| Stratham | 7,742 | 25 | 3.23 | Roughly stable |
| Barrington | 9,607 | 30 | 3.12 | Decreasing |
| Pembroke | 7,524 | 23 | 3.06 | Decreasing |
| Auburn | 6,247 | 16 | 2.56 | Decreasing |
| Hopkinton | 6,118 | 15 | 2.45 | Decreasing |
| Durham | 15,420 | 35 | 2.27 | Mixed |
| Windham | 16,167 | 36 | 2.23 | Mixed |
| Kingston | 6,298 | 14 | 2.22 | Increasing |
| Chester | 5,301 | 11 | 2.08 | Decreasing |
| Sandown | 6,714 | 12 | 1.79 | Decreasing |
| Weare | 9,229 | 16 | 1.73 | Roughly stable |
| New Boston | 6,216 | 10 | 1.61 | Increasing |
| Litchfield | 8,553 | 13 | 1.52 | Decreasing |
| Nottingham | 5,457 | 7 | 1.28 | Decreasing |
| Atkinson | 7,343 | 7 | 0.95 | Decreasing |
Important context
These figures are based on reported selected property offenses and Census population context for validated city candidates. Agency reporting boundaries can differ from municipal boundaries, so the methodology page explains why ambiguous or tiny-denominator rows stay out of automatic publication.