Area Safety Data

State hub ยท OK

Oklahoma property crime city data

Validated city-level FBI NIBRS selected property-offense pages for Oklahoma. This page summarizes candidate cities in the dataset; it is not a statewide crime-rate claim.

Candidate-city rate 22.37 per 1,000 residents across listed cities; not a statewide risk score
Validated cities69Current candidate pages
Candidate population1,892,815Sum of listed city estimates
Selected offenses42,339FBI NIBRS offense records

Highest-rate city candidates

Use the city pages for source notes, trend handling, and offense mix. Small or ambiguous places remain outside automatic publication.

416,182 residents Tulsa 36.27 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents 10,603 residents Warr Acres 34.61 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents 11,396 residents Okmulgee 33.08 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents 8,677 residents Sallisaw 32.50 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents 25,080 residents Ardmore 31.62 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents 20,982 residents Durant 31.31 selected property offenses per 1,000 residents

Oklahoma city candidates

City Population Selected offenses Rate per 1,000 Trend
Tulsa 416,182 15,096 36.27 Decreasing
Warr Acres 10,603 367 34.61 Decreasing
Okmulgee 11,396 377 33.08 Increasing
Sallisaw 8,677 282 32.50 Roughly stable
Ardmore 25,080 793 31.62 Decreasing
Durant 20,982 657 31.31 Increasing
Muskogee 36,858 1,128 30.60 Roughly stable
Poteau 9,075 277 30.52 Decreasing
Miami 12,905 380 29.45 Mixed
Shawnee 32,126 913 28.42 Decreasing
Grove 7,318 207 28.29 Decreasing
Sand Springs 20,362 568 27.90 Decreasing
Lawton 90,239 2,503 27.74 Increasing
Anadarko 5,499 143 26.00 Decreasing
McAlester 18,144 449 24.75 Roughly stable
Cushing 8,394 203 24.18 Increasing
Enid 50,529 1,220 24.14 Roughly stable
Wagoner 8,408 203 24.14 Decreasing
Blackwell 6,039 142 23.51 Increasing
Pauls Valley 6,151 141 22.92 Decreasing
Hugo 5,156 118 22.89 Decreasing
Norman 130,863 2,996 22.89 Decreasing
Pryor Creek 9,687 218 22.50 Roughly stable
Tahlequah 17,344 390 22.49 Increasing
Seminole 7,267 160 22.02 Decreasing
Purcell 6,947 152 21.88 Decreasing
Duncan 23,226 493 21.23 Decreasing
Idabel 6,966 146 20.96 Decreasing
Bartlesville 38,196 796 20.84 Mixed
Vinita 5,404 106 19.62 Increasing
Ada 16,612 322 19.38 Decreasing
Chickasha 16,950 321 18.94 Decreasing
Tecumseh 6,378 110 17.25 Decreasing
Guthrie 11,790 203 17.22 Mixed
Catoosa 7,484 128 17.10 Decreasing
Claremore 20,603 343 16.65 Decreasing
Holdenville 5,924 98 16.54 Decreasing
Kingfisher 5,142 82 15.95 Roughly stable
Stillwater 49,838 793 15.91 Decreasing
Moore 63,728 988 15.50 Decreasing
Clinton 8,333 129 15.48 Decreasing
Bethany 20,482 316 15.43 Decreasing
Glenpool 14,575 223 15.30 Decreasing
Altus 18,616 275 14.77 Decreasing
Woodward 11,699 171 14.62 Decreasing
Sapulpa 23,229 336 14.46 Decreasing
El Reno 20,070 285 14.20 Roughly stable
Owasso 42,729 603 14.11 Roughly stable
Edmond 99,101 1,319 13.31 Roughly stable
Choctaw 12,370 156 12.61 Increasing
Broken Arrow 122,778 1,498 12.20 Decreasing
Yukon 27,056 329 12.16 Decreasing
Jenks 27,916 328 11.75 Roughly stable
Skiatook 8,954 102 11.39 Decreasing
Henryetta 5,620 62 11.03 Decreasing
Noble 7,772 85 10.94 Decreasing
Harrah 6,902 74 10.72 Decreasing
Guymon 12,312 123 9.99 Decreasing
Collinsville 9,749 85 8.72 Decreasing
Newcastle 14,698 126 8.57 Decreasing
Lone Grove 5,273 45 8.53 Decreasing
Mustang 23,932 171 7.15 Decreasing
Bixby 31,853 223 7.00 Decreasing
Blanchard 9,840 68 6.91 Decreasing
Coweta 11,101 64 5.77 Decreasing
Verdigris 5,761 25 4.34 Decreasing
Weatherford 11,993 50 4.17 Decreasing
Tuttle 8,529 34 3.99 Decreasing
Piedmont 9,100 22 2.42 Decreasing

Important context

These figures are based on reported selected property offenses and Census population context for validated city candidates. Agency reporting boundaries can differ from municipal boundaries, so the methodology page explains why ambiguous or tiny-denominator rows stay out of automatic publication.

Read methodology