2024 reported data
A direct, source-backed look at reported selected property offenses for Wasco using FBI NIBRS and Census population context.
Visible next step
Blink Video Doorbell + Sync Module: check visitors, package drops, and the front-door approach in one step. Use it when front-door visibility, package drops, driveway approaches, or vehicle-adjacent areas matter more than another simple alarm.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Short answer
That rate is #250 by highest rate among 294 validated CA city candidates on this site. The largest selected category here is Larceny/theft. Multi-year trend context is pending for this city.
Trend
Trend not available yet; only one FBI source year is loaded for this city. Once prior-year FBI state ZIPs are loaded, this section will show whether reported selected property-offense rates are rising, falling, or roughly stable.
Compare this page with other validated California candidates. These are city-candidate comparisons, not official statewide rankings.
Practical security context
Vehicle theft and larceny patterns often make exterior coverage, driveway visibility, and package-area monitoring worth evaluating.
Disclosure: This site may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Start with a checklist before buying gear.
Short answers help visitors and search systems understand the page without turning the data into a fear claim.
This page cannot tell you whether Wasco is personally safe for you. It shows 2024 reported selected property-offense data: 8.67 offenses per 1,000 residents, with FBI NIBRS and Census source notes.
The largest selected category in this page is Larceny/theft, based on the visible burglary, larceny/theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson breakdown.
Among 294 validated CA city candidates, Wasco ranks #250 by highest selected property-offense rate. The median candidate rate on this state hub is 15.51 per 1,000 residents.
Start with the local pattern, your home layout, entry points, lighting, package areas, and whether a package-area camera checklist fits better than a full monitored system.